CO129-196 - Public Offices & Others - 1881 — Page 468

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

71862/re

the Colonial Ordinance No 10 of 1862 joc

applies both of there in the old folio edition of these Ordinances) that gives to the Chief Justice who shall have served say

16 years a pension of £1290.13.4. on retirement

Lady

b. in the Table to the minute this rule other office is given to "Chief Justices who have not previously served any

the Colony" These words are obviously added to prevent section 5 of the mischief to the case of a Chief Justice applying

who under that section would otherwise get the whole of his

22

Assice ab

Than much smaller salary on the scale £500 a year, and not to exclude allowance of pension altogether, in which construction my case would fall under the rule of 1859 & not under the minute, I submit that if this minute is held to apply to me this is equitable

to owe me a pension in respect of

my years service as

in

Attorney General

the pension

in as much in proportion to the,

I should be entitled to in case I had

served out the 10 years fixed in the Table

Whole to allow me to add

the years com

f

bring a total pensionable

157

"L

of To

180.0.0 1291.13.4

£1441:13.4

& Referring to sec 9 of the Act of 1859 and to of the Minute of 1852 I venture to submit

the following

as special grounds for the grant of

457

a higher pension rate of pension than the

Minimum

the Act or the minute.

that when I was Attorney General the

owners of the United and Confederated rates were, under my advice, so that no objection was taken, dealt with though heavy compensations for errors

here were established decisions as

that my

Chief Justice part China waters,

n and to the Coolie Traffic

and that any efforts caused the Cessation (= the licencing of Gambling Houses, which Acts were repeatedly commended by principal Secretaries of State for the Colonies.

du ccom ww.

— that I was entitled to retire on pension

in 1873 and that I should have been in receipt of a pension from that date to the present time, and that a second such fraction might also be now running, all which annual payments have been saved to the public

that I have had repeatedly serious; sometimes dangerous, illness at Hong Kong. I always left the Colony when and only when

. My so doing illness unfitted me for work. My so occasioned very heavy expenses to me, of which the Colony has had the benefit in my e lengthened service

"that the adoption of a new Code in 1874 effectively changed the procedure in the Supreme Court and imposed on the the greatly increased

Edit History

2026-05-22 22:02:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
71862/re the Colonial Ordinance No 10 of 1862 joc applies both of there in the old folio edition of these Ordinances) that gives to the Chief Justice who shall have served say 16 years a pension of £1290.13.4. on retirement Lady b. in the Table to the minute this rule other office is given to "Chief Justices who have not previously served any the Colony" These words are obviously added to prevent section 5 of the mischief to the case of a Chief Justice applying who under that section would otherwise get the whole of his 22 Assice ab Than much smaller salary on the scale £500 a year, and not to exclude allowance of pension altogether, in which construction my case would fall under the rule of 1859 & not under the minute, I submit that if this minute is held to apply to me this is equitable to owe me a pension in respect of my years service as in Attorney General the pension in as much in proportion to the, I should be entitled to in case I had served out the 10 years fixed in the Table Whole to allow me to add the years com f bring a total pensionable 157 "L of To 180.0.0 1291.13.4 £1441:13.4 & Referring to sec 9 of the Act of 1859 and to of the Minute of 1852 I venture to submit the following as special grounds for the grant of 457 a higher pension rate of pension than the Minimum the Act or the minute. that when I was Attorney General the owners of the United and Confederated rates were, under my advice, so that no objection was taken, dealt with though heavy compensations for errors here were established decisions as that my Chief Justice part China waters, n and to the Coolie Traffic and that any efforts caused the Cessation (= the licencing of Gambling Houses, which Acts were repeatedly commended by principal Secretaries of State for the Colonies. du ccom ww. that I was entitled to retire on pension in 1873 and that I should have been in receipt of a pension from that date to the present time, and that a second such fraction might also be now running, all which annual payments have been saved to the public that I have had repeatedly serious; sometimes dangerous, illness at Hong Kong. I always left the Colony when and only when . My so doing illness unfitted me for work. My so occasioned very heavy expenses to me, of which the Colony has had the benefit in my e lengthened service "that the adoption of a new Code in 1874 effectively changed the procedure in the Supreme Court and imposed on the the greatly increased
Baseline (Original)
71862/re the Colonial Ordinance No 10 of 1862 joc applies both of there in the old folio edition of hese Ordenances) that gives to the Chief Justice whoshall have served say ^ 16 years a pension of #1290.13.4. on fresraturament Lady b. in the Table to the minute this role other office i goven to "Chief Justices who have not previously served any the Colony" There words are oberously ared to prevent section sin of the misula to the case of a Chef Justice applying who under that section would otherworre Cerent the whole of his 22 Assice ab Than much smaller salary on the scale f: soo a year, and not to exclude Airline of parous sence altogether, in which construction my case would fall under the bat of 1859 % prot under themenate, I submit that if this menute is held to apply tome this botequilable to owe me a pens com in respect of my years service as in Attorney Genual e pension in as dion in proportion to the, I should be entitled to in care I had served out the 10 years fined in the Table Whok co to allow me to ad thabres com f bring a total pensiones 157 "L of To 180.0.0 1291.13.4 £1441:13.4 & Referring to see 9 of the Act of 1259 and to of the Minute of 1852 Iventine to submit the following Бо as special grounds for the grant of 457 a higher pension gate of pension than the Minimum the Act or the minute. that when I was Attorney General the masers of the United and Confederated rates ach trying to evade the neutrality regulations were, under my advise, so that no objection was lakker, dealt with though heavy compensations for erros ان here were established decisions as that my Chief Justice part China waters, n and to the Coolie Traffic and that any effort's caused the Cessation (= the licencing of Gambling Herisa's, which Kiuhts were repeatedly commended by pnncipal Secretaries of State for the Colones. du ccom ww. that I was entitled to retire on pension in 1873 and that Lchuld have been in receipt of a pension from that date to the present time, and that a second such francion might also be now running, all which annual payments have been saved to the public that have had repeatedly senous; sometimes dangerous, illnewsal Hong King. I always feft the Colony when and only when . My so doing Mness unfetted me for work. My so occasioned very heavy expences to me, of which the Colony has had the benefit in my e lengthened service "that the adoption of a new Code in 1874 e tively changed the forcedure in the Supreme Court and imposed on the the greatly increased
2026-05-22 22:02:57 · Baseline
View content

71862/re

the Colonial Ordinance No 10 of 1862 joc

applies both of there in the old folio edition of hese Ordenances) that gives to the Chief Justice whoshall have served say

^

16 years a pension of #1290.13.4. on fresraturament

Lady

b. in the Table to the minute this role

other office i goven to "Chief Justices who have not previously served

any

the Colony" There words are oberously ared to prevent section sin of the misula to the case of a Chef Justice

applying

who under that section would otherworre Cerent the whole of his

22

Assice ab

Than much smaller salary on the scale f: soo a year, and not to exclude Airline of parous sence altogether, in which construction my case would fall under the bat of 1859 % prot under themenate, I submit that if this menute is held to apply tome this botequilable

to owe me a pens com in respect of

my years service as

in

Attorney Genual

e pension

in as dion in proportion to the,

I should be entitled to in care I had

served out the 10 years fined in the Table

Whok co to allow me to ad

thabres com

f

bring a total pensiones

157

"L

of To

180.0.0 1291.13.4

£1441:13.4

& Referring to see 9 of the Act of 1259 and to of the Minute of 1852 Iventine to submit

the following

Бо

as special grounds for the grant of

457

a higher pension gate of pension than the

Minimum

the Act or the minute.

that when I was Attorney General the

masers of the United and Confederated rates ach trying to evade the neutrality regulations were, under my advise, so that no objection was lakker, dealt with though heavy compensations for erros

ان

here were established decisions as

that my

Chief Justice part China waters,

n and to the Coolie Traffic

and that any effort's caused the Cessation (= the licencing of Gambling Herisa's, which Kiuhts were repeatedly commended by pnncipal Secretaries of State for the Colones.

du ccom ww.

— that I was entitled to retire on pension

in 1873 and that Lchuld have been in receipt of a pension from that date to the present time, and that a second such francion might also be now running, all which annual payments have been saved to the public

that have had repeatedly senous; sometimes dangerous, illnewsal Hong King. I always feft the Colony when and only when

. My so doing Mness unfetted me for work. My so occasioned very heavy expences to me, of which the Colony has had the benefit in my e lengthened service

"that the adoption of a new Code in 1874 e tively changed the forcedure in the Supreme Court and imposed on the the greatly increased

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.